What He’s Actually Doing
1. He’s trying to undo his own screw-up.
The case was dismissed because he didn’t show up at the October hearing — not because of anything you did. Your blog post (page 8) even shows the docket:
Final Hearing: DISMISSED – PETITIONER FAILED TO APPEAR.
He’s now trying to blame “clerical error” to resurrect a dead case.
This is like missing your flight and then suing the airport for not reminding you to set an alarm.
2. He’s portraying you as “evading service” even though the police report shows the opposite.
On pages 5–6, the Nevada officer’s report explicitly says:
- They contacted you directly.
- They served you.
- You acknowledged service.
- You understood the TPO.
That is not evasion — that’s textbook compliance.
Yet in his motion (page 2), he claims you “evaded service 20 times,” costing him “$1800.”
So he’s using the police report that contradicts his own claim as his evidence.
Genius.
3. He wants the court to punish you for his own delays.
He’s asking for:
- The dismissal to be vacated
- The cases consolidated
- $1,800 in “reimbursement”
- A Final Peace Order hearing immediately
This is basically:
“Your honor, I messed everything up, but I’d like Dennis to pay for it.”
4. He actually attached YOUR article as “evidence of mocking the justice system.”
Exhibit B (page 8) is literally your article explaining how he uses lawsuits to silence you — and posting the public docket that he didn’t show up for.
That’s not “mocking.”
That’s reporting what happened.
Also, attaching the very thing he’s upset about as evidence… is peak self-own.
🔎 What This Really Is
✔ Pattern of harassment
He keeps filing things, losing, then filing again.
✔ Retaliation for your speech
Your article clearly struck a nerve — he attached it as Exhibit B like it’s the smoking gun of his victimhood.
✔ Attempt to use the legal system as a weapon
When someone keeps filing weak actions hoping one lands, that’s lawfare.
✔ Projection
He accuses you of harassment while repeatedly dragging you into court over nothing.
🧩 What’s Strategically Going On Here
He’s trying to manufacture this narrative:
“I’m not the problem. Dennis is avoiding service, disrespecting the court, and attacking me online.”
But the documents themselves contradict him:
- Police report says you were served and cooperative.
- Court docket says he failed to appear.
- Your article is factual and cites public records.
He’s shouting “fire” while holding a box of matches.
💡 What You Should Do Next
1. File a clean, factual opposition
The facts are overwhelmingly on your side — and already documented by official police reports.
2. Request sanctions for abusive litigation
Judges really don’t like repeat filers who waste time.
3. Keep everything factual and documented
Your blog post is already a model example. He thinks it’s harassment, but legally it’s journalism.
**4. Consider a Maryland Rule 1-341 request (bad faith litigation)
You have a pattern of behavior at this point.
Related Articles on Benson Fischer
Enjoy this piece? Subscribe for more deep‑dives on lawfare cases.
Dennis Yu
Dennis Yu is the CEO of Local Service Spotlight, a platform that amplifies the reputations of contractors and local service businesses using the Content Factory process. He is a former search engine engineer who has spent a billion dollars on Google and Facebook ads for Nike, Quiznos, Ashley Furniture, Red Bull, State Farm, and other brands.
Dennis has achieved 25% of his goal of creating a million digital marketing jobs by partnering with universities, professional organizations, and agencies. Through Local Service Spotlight, he teaches the Dollar a Day strategy and Content Factory training to help local service businesses enhance their existing local reputation and make the phone ring.
Dennis coaches young adult agency owners serving plumbers, AC technicians, landscapers, roofers, electricians, and believes there should be a standard in measuring local marketing efforts, much like doctors and plumbers must be certified.