TL;DR: Court records—spanning a six-figure sanctions order, credibility findings, and a bankruptcy case riddled with adverse rulings—show a long pattern in which judges concluded Benson J. Fischer engaged in bad-faith litigation tactics, fabricated or unreliable evidence, and maneuvers to hinder creditors. Those findings matter to anyone weighing his claims in current cases.
Important: This post summarizes public court documents and includes my opinions based on those documents. Readers can review every source linked below.
Key documents (download & read)
- U.S. Bankruptcy Court (D. Md.) – In re Benson J. Fischer, No. 03-13704 (2003–2009) — consolidated filings and orders from Fischer’s Chapter 7 case (fabricated stock certificates, sham-salary findings, tenancy-by-the-entirety transfers, etc.)
- D.C. Superior Court / D.C. Court of Appeals – Paley Rothman / Flax litigation (1997–2000) — Fischer’s case dismissed; defendants awarded ~$930,000 in fees + $40,000 punitive damages, with the appellate court describing “fraud upon the court.” (Order and appellate opinion cited in the bankruptcy record.)
- Current federal civil case (D. Md.): ZivZo, LLC & Benson J. Fischer v. Dennis Yu, No. 8:25-cv-02075-PX — filings, motions, and briefing (including our Opposition to TRO and Motion to Dismiss).
If you’re press or counsel, email press@blitzmetrics.com for the full document packet with bates-labeled excerpts.
For a comprehensive archive of Benson J. Fischer’s lawsuits, court records, and forensic audits, see Benson-Fischer.com.
What courts have already found
1) Bad-faith litigation & fraud upon the court (D.C. litigation)
- In the late 1990s, Fischer sued individuals and the Paley Rothman law firm. After he failed to appear for trial, the court dismissed his case.
- On May 3, 2000, the court awarded the defendants ~$930,000 in attorney’s fees and costs plus $40,000 in punitive damages.
- The D.C. Court of Appeals affirmed and, as reflected in the Maryland bankruptcy record, concluded Fischer had perpetrated a “fraud upon the court,” including the use of fabricated correspondence and knowingly false allegations.
- Why this matters now: An appellate-level fraud-upon-the-court finding is extraordinary. It directly undermines credibility when he later claims to be the victim of others’ speech.
The appellate record (as summarized in the bankruptcy materials) characterizes Fischer’s conduct as “fraud upon the court.”
2) Bankruptcy case: fabricated documents, asset shielding, and sham income (D. Md., 2003–2009)
From the federal bankruptcy record:
- Fabricated/altered stock certificates. The court found certificates were not credible; testimony about them was rejected as unreliable.
- Sham salary & insider structuring. While running Montgomery Bakers, Inc. (MBI), Fischer drew no salary and instead concentrated value in jointly held stock—conduct the court treated as bad faith designed to hinder creditors.
- Tenancy-by-the-entirety & concealment themes. While seeking relief (and, at times, fee waivers), the record reflects very substantial jointly held assets inconsistent with claims of inability to pay.
- Bottom line: Repeated adverse credibility findings and intent-to-hinder conclusions.
The court credited evidence of fabrication and bad-faith asset tactics designed to frustrate lawful collection.
3) Cumulative picture: sanctions, credibility hits, and losses
Across the D.C. and Maryland matters, the pattern is consistent:
- One of the largest fee/punitive sanctions packages (~$970,000) you’ll see in private litigation, expressly linked to fraud on the court.
- A bankruptcy record that spotlights fabricated evidence, evasive asset structures, and bad-faith litigation posture.
- Multiple losses and adverse rulings that go to the heart of credibility.
Why this history is relevant to speech disputes today
Fischer and his company ZivZo, LLC have filed a current federal civil action over articles and posts that critique his business practices and litigation history. When someone with this record asks a court to suppress protected commentary—or seeks emergency restraints (like a TRO) on speech—the past matters:
- Courts weigh likelihood of success and equities. A documented history of fabrication and bad faith will often cut strongly against extraordinary relief that limits speech.
- The public has a legitimate interest in truthful, well-sourced criticism of those who use the courts aggressively, especially when past courts have found abuse of process.
Dennis Yu
Dennis Yu is a former search engine engineer who has spent a billion dollars on Google and Facebook ads for Nike, Quiznos, Ashley Furniture, Red Bull, State Farm, and other organizations that have many locations.
He has achieved 25% of his goal of creating a million digital marketing jobs because of his partnership with universities, professional organizations, and agencies. Companies like GoDaddy, Fiverr, onlinejobs.ph, 7 Figure Agency, and Vendasta partner with him to create training and certifications.
Dennis created the Dollar a Day Strategy for local service businesses to enhance their existing local reputation and make the phone ring. He's coaching young adult agency owners who serve plumbers, AC technicians, landscapers, roofers, electricians in conjunction with leaders in these industries.
Mr. Yu believes that there should be a standard in measuring local marketing efforts, much like doctors and plumbers need to be certified and licensed. His Content Factory training and dashboards are used by thousands of practitioners.